LUMIX DMC-FZ7 レビュー・評価

満足度：4.37

（カテゴリ平均：4.35）

満足度ランキング—位

集計対象84件 / 総投稿数84件

1. 5 58%
2. 4 35%
3. 3 6%
4. 2 1%
5. 1 0%

評価項目	投票平均	カテゴリ平均	項目別ランキング
デザイン 見た目のよさ、質感	4.49	4.38	-位
画質 画像の精細さ、ノイズの少なさなど	3.77	4.17	-位
操作性 メニュー操作・設定のしやすさ	4.30	4.05	-位
バッテリー バッテリーの持ちはよいか	4.43	3.86	-位
携帯性 軽さ、コンパクトさ	3.95	4.16	-位
機能性 手ぶれ補正、撮影モードなど	4.55	4.21	-位
液晶 液晶画面は見やすいか	3.49	4.12	-位
ホールド感 しっかりホールドできるか	4.25	4.05	-位

• ※プロレビュー・モニターレビューは集計対象から除外しています
• ※「カテゴリ平均」より「投票平均」が高い項目を黄色背景にしています

[CybershotW100]

2006年11月15日 20:33 [37420-1]

満足度	2

デザイン	2
画質	1
操作性	1
バッテリー	2
携帯性	5
機能性	4
液晶	1
ホールド感	3

LUMIX DMC-FZ7のレビュー

This model is slow , without supporting USB2.0 high Speed standard, take a lot of time to transfer pics to my PC .....

And I end up with buying an extra Card reader(wasted money) .

This model is so so so noisy.Even at ISO200,the noise problem is severe and can not use after 6pm due to the excessive noise in shadow areas and the horrible noise reduction Venus Engine 2 smearing off all important fine details.


Well , I think FX07 is an ok model even with the horrible noise problem cause it is a snap cam , but this FZ7 is a camera with manual control so people buy this can not accept the horrible picture quality.

The noise is a problem but the excessive noise reduction is more serious problem than the noise itself......

Hope eventually , Panasonic understand that.


I think Power shot S3is and Sony Cyber Shot H5 are much better cameras over all , and so selling better than this FZ7 model.

I gave this to my sister who did not care the horrible noise and subsequent noise reduction effect on its pictures.


If you wanna a bridge camera , better wait until Sony or Canon release a new model with 12x zoom and the Sony N2 's CCD that is way much better CCD than the FZ50 CCD.

the FZ50 is an ok camera , with a great set of features and manual ring zoom , though lacks striking image quality.


the FZ50 is not as cheap as Fuji S6000 FD so the lack of an acceptable level of image quality is not forgiven.

If it were priced like and auto -only camera like FX07 , I would forgive the horrible noise-reduction , though it is supposed to be a serious camera (who care about the raw) , isn't it?

Well ,FZ series are horrible , useless above 200ISO.


If you can not print large over A4 or 3 due to the horrible smearing effect from the horrible noise reduction system , then , what does having 10mp or 7mp mean?


If you print small , then you only need a 4 mega or 5 mega cam , and no need to waste your hard earned money on this PAnasonic FZ series, which is totally over rated.


In fact , having useless 10mp or 7 mp sensor at 400 ISO is just using up your PC memory way too faster than you should have been using an excellent 6mp camera such as S6000FD or S3Is .

Plus , the FZ50 and 7 lack the important USB 2.0 "high speed" , that means , you will have to buy a card reader to waste more money .......



Canon , Sony , Fuji cameras are all equipped with USB 2.0 high speed , while no panasonic cameras are equaipped with it ...



Ifthe FZ50 was a 5 mp cam with all its features and the great lens , it would be much better model than it is now (without excessive noise reduction requaired).

Any way, the FZ7 is a useless camera , only one good point is the size .

Do not waste any money on the FZ7 or LX2 both are horrible cameras.


the FZ50 is a bit better as a whole , but still the image quality suffers from the excessive noise reduction, and much to be desired.

Only when you don't mind taking pics Raw , FZ50 is a good model for you.

FX07 is ok as a snap camera since it is a cheap model with a quite good lens.


Panasonic should not make any serious prosumer model just stick with P and S cameras (point and shoot).

Hope Panasonic will come up with a better sensor and reduce the excessive level of noise reduction , then will become a true winning package.

I may buy the FZ50 for myself and test it , just curious to know it is as bad as I think it is (I just used it for 4 days since my dad bought it but he sold it to his friend 3 days ago).